Home :   Forums :   Contribute :  Calendar :  Links :  Journals :  Videos :  Search :  HELP! :  Careers  
 Welcome to Iowa Sportsman!

Be sure to check out the Site Rules.
05/17/2012 @ 05:23 PM

Facing Whitetail Facts

   

As some of you may remember there was a time when I posted here, regularly years ago. There is no excuse for my absence. I'll be frank and blame my software inabilities exacerbated by computer glitches.

So, with that said, what brings me back and what poses itself to my mental quandaries and forces me to type away at the keys in hopes that YOU will give me your undivided attention? Let's face it; the numbers don't lie. The deer harvest is, shall we say, down.

I made a determination this past season to do the late muzzle loader and due to the high prices associated with the 'privelege' of hunting (thanks to insurance lobbies and our wonderful representatives at the State level) I grabbed two weeks vacation and thanks to gas prices, decided to stay close to home. No big deal, right?

Without boring you with the details, let me say in passing that I went on consecutive days to my most productive areas from past years and saw no sign that would indicate to me that there had been any activity at all for at least two, if not three weeks. I was six days in and had not scared a single tail. I chanced upon the DNR WMA maps page on Friday morning and saw a sliver of public land that I felt fit the bill. I set my coffee down and said, "Hot Dog"...or something to that effect. It was a Yogi Berra godsend in that there was no way that anyone would go there because it was just too crowded!

A simple determination made all the difference; with the roar of traffic close by, I drew a bead on a fat doe amongst a dozen and filled the tag. I was the only one who had been there for quite some time. I was the only one there, that day. The evidence was apparent and I won't dwell on it. What I will elaborate on is the conversations that occurred after the fact with DNR types.

After filling in a State agent about the results I'd achieved, we had a long conversation concerning the situations for coming seasons and it is not pretty. His concern was with the amount of tags, the fact that the prices are being driven by those who do not want us to hunt at all-thanks to liability issues-and the greed of our State to get as much dollar from you as possible by putting out as many tags as they can to keep the revenue flowing. This is not healthy, folks! I verified this through talks with a local county conservation officer whom I trust without hesitation. The folks in charge of the tag prices DO NOT TRUST YOU WITH A GUN. Their hope is to drive you away and compel you to find other things to do with your time. How? Tag prices out of reach and NO DEER to hunt...that's how.

I asked him a question that I considered quite simple, "Why not have intervening years where a hunter gets one tag. Buck or doe is no consequence because there will be no seperate seasons. You will be given three month to fill it...PERIOD. This approach would allow some breathing room for all, not to mention the benefits for the health of the population. Once you filled the tag; Game over.

Whether by hook, or crook, bow or muzzle loader, shotgun or handgun, you have ONE tag...period.

Would you be willing to settle for this?

Most importantly, would the State? Or, are they just too greedy for that flow of cash? Do we truly care about the long-term ramifications of the situation as it is unfolding at the present rate?

One tag. Could you live with this approach every other year until the deer population stabilizes?

It is time to consider this proposition before it is too late and the ones who don't want us out there at all win by default, people.

Please consider this a warning. The golden years we saw just five years ago are dwindling away quickly. If we don't cut back on the tags we'll never see those glorious numbers again in our lifetime.

We need to talk to our State representatives and we need to do it now. For the sake of our deer and our hunting fraternity; for the sake of our children who've never experienced the thrill and gratification of a harvest-we need to act now. No more bow here and shotgun there: everyone with one tag for one season for one year. Are you willing? I think the deer are.

The best to your efforts in the coming year.



Story Options

Facing Whitetail Facts | 14 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: Dogggman on 02/08/2012 @ 05:55 PM

Probably a good idea for a couple years to bring the population up.  There are two problems with this issue though:

1.  Economy: Many people rely on Venison as their main meat source in Iowa.

2.  Farmers and Farm Bureau own the Governer who in turn regulates the DNR.  DNR hands are tied.  That is why we have not had a reduction in deer tags.

 * It will be up to us hunters to regulate ourselves.*

---
Use a trained retriever

Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: Bowtech11 on 02/10/2012 @ 10:53 PM
OMG!!! Conspiracy theroies?? This is at best an opinion piece with little logic for backup. If you think the deer numbers are bad now you have no recollection of the 1980's or before. Is the herd down..........yes? Beyond that your writing fiction.
Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: Brimcowa on 02/11/2012 @ 06:44 AM

I appreciate the remarks, as well as the retorts, concerning the issues that I raised in the piece.  I have gained new perspectives and will keep them close to my thoughts whenever I speak to the two agents mentioned and the hundreds of customers I constantly speak with at the outdoor retail establishment where I'm employed.

Obviously, some folks are more knowledgable than others on any given issue.  I would only close by asking that my conspiratorial rant be taken objectively until a state representative can produce an article contrary to what I have posted concerning the lobbying efforts.

Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: jetblack3 on 02/12/2012 @ 11:23 PM

One deer a year, are you kidding me ?   We're nowhere near in need of that yet... However the way the DNR/state runs their deer program is nothing more than greed at its finest example. With the advent of early doe, youth,late doe, extra doe, etc.....it is nothing more than a dreamed up idea to generate more cash flow. Iowas deer season goes on way too long (4 months or more) State will tell you that it is that way because too many hunters would be in the woods at the same time making it unsafe. I call BS, safety does play a role but it is not #1. Cash flow is king, always has and always will be period.

I will still bow hunt every year cause I enjoy the outdoors and what nature has to offer. When the population gets like it was in the 80's I will discipline myself accordingly regardless of law. You can be assured that I will take necessary action long before the state does cause I manage my land for deer not financial gain. Then when I'm done bow hunting I will pack my lunch and make my way to my deer blinds for the shotgun seasons. We don't need additional special seasons. To say we do just makes us hipocrites. 

I believe that state offers ways to aquire too many tags and it needs to be limited a little more. I also feel that the state needs to give the DNR agents more ability to limit or manage the counties they have juristiction in because there are overpopulated areas that do need to be controlled, but they won't. They'll ride this cash cow as far and long as they can well beyond common sense. Iowas pheasant population is the latest great example of this. Seasons should have been shortened or closed, bag limits should've be reduced to preserve whats left until the conditions improve to sustain a healthy population again, but did they ? NO !  will they ? NO ! but they'll still take that out of state money for a couple years until its realized that they're ain't any birds left and then these people will not come back and money is now no longer pouring in. Had they not been so greedy they would have taken steps to show its important to them by restocking hard hit areas, shorting season, and reducing bag limits.     

Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: docmudge on 02/15/2012 @ 08:22 AM

I would say your proposition would bring the deer numbers up, but that's necessarily a good thing. It shouldn't be grocery shopping. Yes, it was a tough season. A lot of people who were so used to going out for a week and filling their freezer in short order are groaning about the numbers because it's more challenging now. Some counties are still loaded with deer and some are down. Is the governor going beyond his purview by regulating deer tag numbers? Probably. My biggest concern over that would be having multiple methods of take in one season. The biggest benefit to having bow season during the rut is to allow a more challenging hunt when bucks are more easily called in. Having a muzzleloader available to take one without it needing to be within 50 yards isn't a "fair" fight, in my opinion.

---
[Doc Mudge] - Eat. Sleep. Fish. Is there anything else?

Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: DanceswithSkunks on 02/26/2012 @ 03:26 AM
In a free ranging herd of White-Tailed deer, the antlerless harvest is the number one tool managers have. Season length is a distant second. Lawful weapons, special weapons seasons would be third and contribute little if anything to a reduction in the antlerless harvest.
Facing Whitetail Facts
Authored by: johnhunter247 on 04/02/2012 @ 11:06 PM
I have always been a fan of a one buck rule. I don't care what state your in!

---
IF ITS BROWN ITS NOT DOWN! BE SELECTIVE! LET THEM GROW!

Created this page in 0.06 seconds 
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Home
Copyright © 1997-2009 All Rights Reserved Iowa Sportsman is a division of Twin Rivers Media
900 Central Avenue Suite 1, Fort Dodge IA, 50501
Phone: 877-424-4594 Fax 515-574-2364 Email: info@twinriversmedia.com